Guardians and Conservators: Guardian ad Litem
Liberty
Northwest Ins. Corp. v. Halling and Oliver [1/7/02] 2002 MTWCC 1 In
the absence of guidance in Montana law regarding compensation of a guardian
ad litem in the Workers' Compensation Court, that determination must
fall on general principles of equity and reasonableness. Contrary to
the insurer's argument, the limitation on penalties and assessments
stated in section 39-71-2905, MCA (1999), is inapplicable in the context
of guardian costs. Compensation of a guardian is also not within the
purview of the attorney's fees provisions of sections 39-71-611 and
-612, MCA (1999). Section 39-71-612, MCA (1999), does require the insurer
to pay reasonable costs as established by the Court if there is a dispute
over the amount of benefits due. While the insurer has evidently paid
benefits on behalf of the minor, it has apparently not paid all benefits
due beneficiaries and has filed a declaratory judgment action putting
the amount of the minor's benefits at issue. It is within the equitable
power of the Court and the costs provision of section 39-71-612, MCA
(1999), to treat guardian fees as a cost to be assessed against the
insurer. In this context of this case, where the insurer commenced the
litigation and stands to benefit the most from an order governing all
beneficiaries, guardian ad litem fees should be borne by the insurer.
|
Dixon
v. State Fund [7/26/01] 2001 MTWCC 40 The $75 hourly rate set
in ARM 24.29.3802 for attorneys handling workers' compensation claims
on an hourly rate basis is an appropriate rate of compensation for attorneys
acting as guardians ad litem in workers' compensation proceedings.
Claims for fees from guardians will be reviewed by the Court for reasonableness.
|
Dixon
v. State Fund [7/26/01] 2001 MTWCC 40 Applying general principles
of equity and reasonableness, and following the unanimous recommendation
of the parties who have taken a position on the matter, the Court orders
State Fund to pay reasonable guardian fees without recoupment from benefits
since State Fund requested appointment of guardians and stands to benefit
most from inclusion of all known possible beneficiaries in this litigation.
Given the circumstances of this case and the virtual agreement of the
parties, the Court does not reach the alternative arguments. |
Simons-Tollefson
v. State Fund [2/16/00] 2000 MTWCC 7 Insurer moved to dismiss
petition for benefits filed on behalf of minor child of deceased worker
on ground that 39-71-601, MCA (1992) requires written claim "within
12 months . . . either by the claimant or someone legally authorized
to act for him in his behealf." Against the background of case
law and other statutes, WCC held no one was legally authorized to act
for the minor until a guardian or guardian ad litem had been appointed
for the purpose of seeking workers' compensation benefits, even though
the minor's mother was authorized to act on his behalf in other contexts.
Where a guardian had not yet been appointed, the statute had not yet
commenced and the motion to dismiss was denied. Where insurer did not
object to mother's qualifications, WCC appointed her guardian ad litem.
|
Blowers
v. Montana Insurance Guaranty Association [02/28/95] 1995 MTWCC 15
Where widow of deceased worker seeks lump sum conversion of benefits
on behalf of herself and her minor child, a guardian ad litem must be
appointed on behalf of the minor before the Workers’ Compensation
Court will address the merits of her request. |