Injury and Accident: Occupational Disease
MONTANA
SUPREME COURT DECISIONS |
Lanes v. Montana State Fund, 2008 MT 306, 346 Mont. 10, 192 P.3d 1145 A temporary aggravation of a pre-existing degenerative condition does not result in an injurious exposure pursuant to § 39-72-303, MCA. |
Burglund
v. Liberty Mutual Fire Ins. Co., 286 Mont. 134, 950 P.2d 1371 (1997)
Supreme Court affirmed WCC determination that cause of claimant's current
back-related disability was 1984 injury and not occupational disease
insurer claimed arose after claimant returned to work. Claimant met
his burden of establishing a clear connection between his current condition
and the 1984 injury through physician's testimony. Insurer did not prove
causation through occupational disease where doctor could not determine
with any precision what effect claimant's resumed work had on his condition,
testified claimant's low back condition would have deteriorated even
if he had not resumed his UPS duties, and testified that post-injury
work was not a substantial cause of the degeneration. |
MONTANA
WORKERS' COMPENSATION COURT DECISIONS |
Burglund
v. Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance Co. [8/29/96] 1996 MTWCC 60
UPS driver and insurer disputed
whether claimant's current disability was result of 1984 back injury
and following surgery or occupational disease resulting from claimant's
return to work. Based on medical testimony, Court found condition was
result of earlier injury. Physician's testimony left no doubt that claimant's
1991 surgery, and thus his 1984 injury, are substantial and material
factors in claimant's current disability. WCC was persuaded claimant's
continued employment may have hastened the degenerative process, but
was not persuaded it substantially or materially did so. Most importantly,
physician testified that even had claimant not returned to a labor intensive
job, his degenerative condition would have ultimately progressed and
that the current condition is consistent with a natural progression
of the underlying condition. (Note: WCC decision
affirmed by Supreme Court in Burglund
v. Liberty Mutual Fire Ins. Co., 286 Mont. 134, 950 P.2d 1371 (1997).) |