Lyons
v. Montana State Fund [04/26/06] 2006 MTWCC 17 Where Petitioner
asserts he is “permanently disabled, unable to pay his medical
bills and unable to do his job of injury,” but offers no details
or support for this allegation, Petitioner’s pleading is insufficient
to demonstrate good cause for an emergency setting. |
Travelers
Insurance Co. v. Ulrich-Goodwin [04/27/06] 2006 MTWCC 18
Good cause for an emergency setting has not been demonstrated where
Petitioner seeks a declaratory ruling ordering Respondent to travel
from Kalispell to Bozeman for an IME without alleging sufficient detail
in its petition from which the Court might find that an examination
in Bozeman is as close to Respondent’s residence as practical,
as required by § 39-71-605(1)(b), MCA. |
Peterson
v. Montana Schools Group Ins. Authority [06/02/05] 2005 MTWCC 30
Rule 24.5.311 of the Rules of the Workers’ Compensation Court
requires a petitioner seeking an emergency trial setting to set forth
in the petition sufficient facts showing that an emergency setting is
necessary. Where the petition sets out no facts with respect to the
request, the request will be denied. |