39-71-412, MCA
MONTANA
SUPREME COURT DECISIONS |
George v. Bowler, 2015 MT 209, 380 Mont. 155, 354 P.3d 585 For purposes of applying the co-employee immunity rule, the simple fact that two persons have the same employer would not necessarily invoke the rule. The proper test for determining when a co-worker is an “employee” for purposes of applying the co-employee immunity rule in § 39-71-412, MCA, is whether the co-employee was acting in the course and scope of his employment at the time the negligent acts occurred. |
George v. Bowler, 2015 MT 209, 380 Mont. 155, 354 P.3d 585 Separate legal entities are not considered “third parties” as that term is used in § 39-71-412, MCA, and Article II, § 16 of the Montana Constitution, when they are acting within the course and scope of their employment as co-employees of the claimant at the time the alleged negligence occurred. |
WORKERS'
COMPENSATION COURT DECISIONS |