39-71-1025, MCA
Markovich
v. Liberty Northwest [06/14/07] 2007 MTWCC 21
Where Respondent paid for Petitioner’s travel expenses and other
expenses up to the $4,000 statutory limit, Petitioner is not entitled
to receive additional travel expenses from Respondent. |
[1997]
McCoy
v. Benefis Healthcare [11/19/02] 2002 MTWCC 59
Commuting to and from school to fulfill a rehabilitation plan is "travel"
required to "implement a rehabilitation plan." Under section 39-71-1025(3),
MCA (1997), auxiliary benefits are available to reimburse a claimant
for such travel. |
[1999]
Applegate
v. Liberty Northwest Ins. [10/9/02] 2002 MTWCC 45 Commuting
to and from school to fulfill a rehabilitation plan is "travel" required
to "implement a rehabilitation plan." Under section 39-71-1025(3), MCA
(1999), auxiliary benefits are available to reimburse a claimant for
such travel. |
[1999]
Applegate
v. Liberty Northwest Ins. [10/9/02] 2002 MTWCC 45 Where
a statute (§ 39-71-1025, MCA (1999)) broadly provides for reimbursement
for travel which is necessary to "implement a rehabilitation plan,"
a court cannot insert an exclusion which would bar reimbursement for
commuting 84 miles to and from school. |
[1999]
Thompson
v. Liberty Northwest Ins. Corp. [6/12/02] 2002 MTWCC 34
Travel to and from school
in connection with a rehabilitation plan are encompassed within auxiliary
benefits authorized in section 39-71-1025, MCA (1999). |