1) Exhibits must
be bound like a "deposition" or in a three-ring binder.
2) An index listing
all exhibits, preferably in the form which is used by the Court, must
be the first page of the exhibit. This index must also be included
in the final Pretrial Order. (Example.)
3) Within the binder
each exhibit must be tabbed with its identifying exhibit number extending
on the right side of the divider page (if used) or the first page
of each exhibit.
4) Each page within
each exhibit must be numbered. (Ex. 1 - 1, Ex. 1 - 2, Ex. 2 - 1, Ex.
2 - 2, etc.)
5) Include the
number of pages within each exhibit on the index sheet. (Ex. 1, (pp.
1-3); Ex. 2, (p. 1), etc.)
6) DO NOT GIVE
THE COURT AN ILLEGIBLE EXHIBIT. It serves to frustrate. If an
exhibit is illegible, the offering party, with the consent of the
opposing party, can request the author of the exhibit to reproduce
the exhibit so it is legible. A deposition can be taken to clarify
the contents of any exhibit.
7) The Workers'
Compensation Court does not distinguish between petitioner or respondent
exhibits; therefore, all exhibits are numbered sequentially.
8) There
shall be no duplication within the exhibit packet! Save a tree!
9) OBJECTIONS must
be specific and noted on the index sheet and in the final Pretrial
Order. Failure to make an objection in the Pretrial Order may result
in the Judge not allowing the objection to be made at the time of
trial.
10) Always
call the Clerk's Office if you have a question. It will save you and
the Court time, energy, frustration, and possibly your sanity. (444-7794)
1) The preferred
way to refer to a doctor's report is to mark it as its own exhibit.
2) If more than
one report by a provider is included in an exhibit, the oldest or
first report should be page number 1 within the section and the latest,
most recent report should be the final page.
3) There should
be no duplication of medical reports. An exception might be when in
order for the report of a provider to have continuity or make sense
the review of a different provider's report is necessary, i.e., panels
frequently rely on the records of previous providers. Unless inclusion
of a duplicate document is imperative to the understanding of the
subject report, do not include the document for a second time.
