%@LANGUAGE="JAVASCRIPT" CODEPAGE="1252"%>
Use Back Button to return to Index of Cases
2003 MTWCC 32A
¶1 The Uninsured Employers' Fund (UEF) has moved to amend the judgment in this case to add a provision requiring Melotz Trucking, Incorporated to indemnify and reimburse it for all benefits it is legally obligated to pay to the claimant. The request was set out in its response to the petition and in the Pretrial Order but overlooked by the Court. Finding good cause, the judgment is amended to add the following provision:
¶2 The UEF and employer have also moved to amend the judgment to strike the award of costs. The motion is denied. Although the request for costs was not specifically set out in the Pretrial Order, costs are routinely granted any prevailing claimant. I have previously determined that under Court rule costs may be awarded against the UEF. Pekus v. Uninsured Employers' Fund, 2003 MTWCC 33. ¶3 This Order Amending Judgment, is certified as final for all purposes of appeal. DATED in Helena, Montana, this 20th day of May, 2003. (SEAL) \s\ Mike
McCarter c: Mr. Steven S. Carey |
Use Back Button to return to Index of Cases